Free Law School Case Brief

Look Up Legal Definitions

Just type in a word and hit search and you can look up one word at a time in Deanís Law School Case Brief. The program will display only the first 100 words of any definition. You must know the exact word.
Create Account | Login
E-mail:
Password:
Forget Password
Lawdictionaryonline

Law Student Casebriefs
 

Our casebriefs are the best written and edited. No one even comes close. Here is an excerpt from Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff Gordon.  

 

LEGAL ANALYSIS: Then-Judge Cardozo's opinion in Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff Gordon, 222 N.Y. 88, 118 N.E. 214 (1917), underpins the analysis for a duty of good faith to supply missing terms. In that case, the defendant Lady Duff Gordon, a self-styled "creator of fashions," agreed with the plaintiff Otis Wood that he would have the exclusive right, subject to her approval, to sell her designs, to license others to market them, and to place her endorsement on the designs of others. As Cardozo phrased it, "she employed the plaintiff to turn this vogue into money." Id. at 90. Under the agreement, Lady Duff Gordon was to receive one half of "all profits and revenues" derived from contracts made by the defendant involving her work. Id. at 90.


The defendant sued Lady Duff Gordon, claiming that she had placed her endorsement on various products without his knowledge and kept the profits for herself. Lady Duff Gordon claimed in response that the original agreement between herself and Wood was unenforceable and illusory because it failed to specify Wood's obligation to sell and market her designs. In Wood, the Court held that although the contract between the parties did not spell out each party's obligations, the law has outgrown its primitive stage of formalism when the precise word was the sovereign talisman, and every slip was fatal. It takes a broader view to-day. A promise may be lacking, and yet the whole writing may be instinct with an obligation, imperfectly expressed. If that is so, there is a contract. Id. at 91 (internal quotation marks omitted).

The Court found the implication of a binding promise between the parties from numerous aspects of the agreement. Lady Duff Gordon gave Wood the "exclusive" right to market her creations; she must have expected him to perform, because her business would have ceased to exist without him. Additionally, Lady Duff Gordon's sole compensation was to be one-half of the profits: Therefore unless Wood made reasonable efforts under the agreement, she could recover nothing under its terms, defeating the "business efficacy" that both parties must have desired when they made the agreement. Id.

The contract between Wood and Lady Duff Gordon was upheld, and generated a body of law in which  the duty of good faith upheld binding agreements with scant details. See Curtis Props. Corp. v. Greif Cos., 212 A.D.2d 259, 265-66, 628 N.Y.S.2d 628, 632 (1st Dep't 1995); Ultra Innovations, Inc. v. Food Lion, Inc., 130 N.C. App. 315, 317-18, 502 S.E.2d 685, 687 (1998); 2 Corbin § 5.27 ("The finding of implied promises is more common today than in the era before the Wood case. Courts recognize that if the parties intend a contract, rather than a nullity, implying promises to avoid the finding of illusoriness or indefiniteness protects the reasonable expectation of the parties engendered by the agreement.").   An implied promise is sufficient detriment to the plaintiff to constitute consideration.

The term valuable consideration is the type of consideration that makes a contract valid. The detriment in this arrangement was the implied promise to use best efforts which is considered a change of position. The court's desire to validate these types of agreements has great merit. If these types of agreements were treated as illusory, many businesses would not be able to get their products to the marketplace through the use of manufacturers' representatives. This case is codified under UCC 2-306(2); an exclusive dealing contract implies an obligation by both parties to use their best efforts.   Note: Consideration is any change in position; the use of best efforts would be a change in position.  Casebooks with fully briefed Casebriefs (you can put these in columns if it is appropriate.

There is so much more.....we invite you to see just how good we are!

 

Casebooks with fully briefed Casebriefs

Administrative law:                   

Breyer,            7th       

Cass                 7h      

Funk                5th      

Strauss             11th  

Bankruptcy:

Bussel             10th
  

Civil Procedure:                  

		

Babcock,      5th   

Field,            11th  

Freer             6th  

Friedenthal, 11th

Glannon       2nd

Hazard,         11th

Ides              5th  

Marcus,        6th   

Spencer        4th

Subrin          4th  

Yeazell         9th   

Constitutional Law:                   

		

Barron,         8th   

Brest,            6th  

Chemerinsky 4rd

Choper         12th 

Varat            14th

Farber,          5th   

Sullivan,       19th

Kmiec          4th 

Rotunda,      11th

Stone,           7th

Shanor          5th

Contracts:                       

		

Barnett,        5th 

Burton,         4th  

Blum            3rd  

Calamari,     6th   

Crandall,      7th   

Dawson,       10th

Epstein         4th   

Farnsworth,  8th

Fuller,           9th   

Knapp,         8th   

Ayres,           8th   

Murray         7th   

Scott             5th   

George         1st   

Summers      7th

Kunz            2nd

Corporations:                          

		

Bauman      8th

Choper,       8th   

Eisenberg,  11th

Hamilton,    12th

Klein,           9th   

O'Kelly         7th   

Smiddy         8th   

Criminal Law: 

		

Bonnie,         4th 

Dripps          12th

Marcus         7th

Dressler,       7th 

Johnson,       7th

Kadish,         9th   

Kaplan,         7th   

LaFave         5th  

          
Criminal Procedure: 

		

Allen Stuntz       4th 

Chemerinsky     2nd  

Dressler/tho      5th

Haddad,            7th      

Israel,                2015  

Kamisar,           14th

Saltzburg,          10th    

Tomkovicz          8th         

 

Evidence: 

		

Broun,        8th   

Lempert     4th   

Mueller,      8th   

Park            12th

Fisher         3rd  

Family Law: 

		

Abrams       4th

Areen,          6th

Estin            1st

Harris          5th   

Wadlington  7th

Weisberg     6th

Professional Res: 
Hazard             5th   
Real Property:

		

Cribbet         9th

Dukeminier 8th

Kurtz,           6th   

Rabin            6th

Singer,          6th  

Nelson          4th   

French           6th

Remedies: 

		

Ames            1st  

Kovacic         8th

Laycock        4th  

Rendleman   8th   

Taxation: 

Freeland,         18th

Bankman         16th    
Torts: 

		

Best              4th  

Christie        5th   

Dobbs,          7th   

Epstein,        10th

Franklin,       9th   

Goldberg      4th

Henderson,   8th

Prosser         13th

Twerski        3rd

Vetri             5th 

Weaver         4th

Wills/Trusts:

		

Dukeminier, 9th

Sterk    5th